On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:21:56AM -0700, william(at)elan.net allegedly wrote:
> BTW, the feature saying the message itself is valid up to certain date > could be quite useful. Many emails are written with expectations that > they would be read in 1-2 days and if not done message content is no > longer of a significant use to the recipient. This is however a > separate issue. Would that be the obsolete Expiry-Date:? Mark. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
