I also read it the same way Arvel did. Also, if it isn't interpreted
that way, you get ambiguities when multiple instances of a particular
header are listed and only some of the values are presented in z=. In
particular, the z= field is also supposed to help you work around header
reordering; you need all values to be there in order to do that.
Tony Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arvel Hathcock wrote:
>> The z= tag allows you to put as many or as few headers in it as you
>> want. I typically only put subject, from, to and maybe a few others
>> that I regularly see getting toasted. Was this actually unclear? If
>> so it might make sense to be more explicit.
>
> Mike, it could just be me being dense. FWIW though this text was
> understood by two of us here as meaning copy all the headers:
>
> "A vertical-bar-separated list of header field names and copies of
> header field values that identify the header fields present when the
> message was signed."
>
> Perhaps:
>
> "A vertical-bar-separated list of select header field names and copies
> of header field values that identify the header fields present when the
> message was signed. It is not required to include all header field
> names and values."
>
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
