Eric Allman wrote:
> It seems defining the state of the signature rather than possible > remedies would be more useful.phoffman> Fully agree. arvel> This makes sense to me as well. So is there consensus that this change belongs in -02?
sounds good to me.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
