On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 07:07:19PM -0700, Douglas Otis allegedly wrote: > >Is this r= thing fundamental to that [verification] function or > >could it be developed as a separate exercise above and beyond the > >base?
> A good point. There is no desire... Doug. As far as I can tell, your 420 word reply said neither yes or no. But to be frank, I stopped reading after the second paragraph. Sorry. The good news is that the first 100 words seemed like they were trending towards a no, so I'll run with that. Mark. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
