Well I hate to insist that signers SHOULD do anything but doesn't the issue of multiple signatures belong in a mail list addendum rather than base? If I am forwarding should I want to forward an unverifiable signature over my verifiable one, how would that impact my reputation?
Bill Oxley Messaging Engineer Cox Communications, Inc. Alpharetta GA 404-847-6397 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 3:18 PM To: IETF-DKIM Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1287: K... Otis, signature removal >> Wait a minute, hasn't this been discussed ad nauseum with the clear >> consensus to leave this text in? > > Signers SHOULD NOT remove any DKIM-Signature header fields from > messages they are signing, even if they know that the signatures > cannot be verified. Well, it's easy to sort out whether we've had sufficient discussion: Does anyone support Doug's request to remove this text? If you do, please respond here by Thursday's jabber chat. Barry -- Barry Leiba, Internet Messaging Technology ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.research.ibm.com/people/l/leiba http://www.research.ibm.com/spam _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
