Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Our main Montreal agenda is for a) finishing base and b) kicking > off SSP-related discussions. (a) seems nicely in-hand. > > For (b) we'd like to get anyone who'd like an agenda slot to > write up an individual I-D (before the 19th June cutoff!) and then > ask the chairs for however many minutes you'd like. We'll allocate > the time as we see fit however. Your I-D need not contain a fully > worked out proposal for an SSP-like thing, it can simply be a delta > off of the current SSP I-D or anything else consistent with > achieving our charter goals related to SSP. We do have draft-allman-dkim-ssp-01; is there any problem with using that as a starting point? Or do we need to lay some groundwork first, such as a requirements document?
-Jim _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
