On Jun 16, 2006, at 2:33 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
John R Levine wrote:
Well, it's not in our charter, but assuming that the -base
discussion
doesn't take up the entire agenda it seems worthwhile socializing it
in a pre-re-charter kind of way. I'll note that Auth-res is pretty
intertwinned with SSP as well.
I hope we can get it un-twined. The most likely use of the auth
header is so that an MTA can pass along the DKIM info to a MUA
that is
one or two hops downstream for sorting. That shouldn't need to have
anything to do with SSP.
+1
Agreed. A results header would be independent of DKIM. There may be
some general considerations in a BCP paper about the impact of
signing these types of headers.
-Doug
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
