> 1. Some people wouldn't see an important distinction between PS and DS > since more-or-less everyone has to implement the PS and few features, > once deployed, are totally deprecated. That might influence whether or > not you think its useful to remove it now or at DS. OTOH, if everyone > has to support simple regardless of PS vs. DS, then who cares? There's > no effect on interop.
In addition, DS has become meaningless. Very few of standard-track documents ever go beyond PS. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
