I wrote: > A more practical use of CNAMEs regarding DKIM might be more like this: > [broken example]. Make that... > foo._domainkey.sub1.domain.com CNAME foo._domainkey.domain.com > foo._domainkey.sub2.domain.com CNAME foo._domainkey.domain.com > foo._domainkey.sub3.domain.com CNAME foo._domainkey.domain.com > foo._domainkey.sub4.domain.com TXT "subdomain 4 key record" > foo._domainkey.domain. com TXT "normal domain key record" > _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
- Re: [ietf-dkim] bh=; l=0; Stephen Farrell
- Re: [ietf-dkim] bh=; l=0; Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] bh=; l=0; Stephen Farrell
- Re: [ietf-dkim] bh=; l=0; Mark Delany
- Re: [ietf-dkim] bh=; l=0; Stephen Farrell
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues John Levine
- [ietf-dkim] CNAME's Michael Thomas
- [ietf-dkim] Re: CNAME's John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: CNAME's Eliot Lear
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: CNAME's Eliot Lear
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's Mark Delany
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's Peter Koch
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's Mark Delany
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's Steve Atkins
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's + multiple s... Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's Mark Delany
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's Steve Atkins
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's Mark Delany
