Paul Hoffman wrote: >> This seems to be a comment against SSP. > > Wrong. it is a comment against trying to predict the future and gating > our publication on those guesses. We can (should!) remain silent on > future changes to email, and then deal with them when they happen. This > is how IETF protocol development works.
Correct on all 3 counts. and i suggest that we can now end this thread. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
