> This is, in some sense, dictating policy instead of being confined to > mechanism, which we've been assiduously avoiding. Viewed that way, it > seems inappropriate to have this requirement. ... > It seems consistent with the other changes we've been > making, which is why I have some small hope we can get this through in > just a couple of hours. > > Thoughts?
+1 d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
