With h=;, you don't need to sign the header. And with l=0, you don't
need the body either. But I'm not convinced that either one would be a
good thing to do.
Tony Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> With no headers at all being signed, a signature should still be either
> valid or invalid and therefore still useful. Don't NEED headers for
> base.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
