Stephen Farrell wrote: > The question: is it better for this document to be published as an > historic RFC "now" or at the same time as the standards track DKIM > base RFC is published? (Where all timings here are modulo the RFC > editor's queuing discipline.) "same time", except that if the publication of DK is delayed for any reason (e.g., editorial stuff, or queuing priorities), publication of DKIM -base should not be delayed. If they're published at the same time, then sure, give DK the lower RFC number.
I presume the RFC Index will list DK as obsoleted by [DKIM RFC number]? -Jim _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
