Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> "If any tag listed as 'required' in Section 3.5 is missing from the >> DKIM-Signature header field, the verifier [...]." > > I would prefer "Unless every tag listed here is included in..." That casts the language as a negative (or exceptional, or the like.) Humans do a better job of comprehendingaffirmative forms better that exceptional, exclusionary, or negative forms. > And I really would prefer the list be here, not manually culled from 3.5 > by each reader of the spec. +1. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
