Paul Hoffman wrote: > At 9:57 AM -0700 7/20/06, Douglas Otis wrote: >> A follow-on: > > -1. We should not be thinking about changing IDNA or RFC 2822 in the > DKIM WG.
Paul, I think you are being entirely too rigid in your views. There is nothing wrong with having a working group take on extra tasks, very late in its basic work, that are a) entirely outside the scope of its charter, and b) likely to de-stabilize that basic work... d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
