> We should require that DKIM signers only sign messages that are >RFC 2822 conformant. (We will need a small amount of text that >explains why.)
I'd be inclined to say that messages to be signed SHOULD conform to 2822. There are some 822 MTAs that produce nice clean messages that pass through relays with little trouble, such as the one I'm using. The explanatory text is indeed important to make it clear we're not just being religious purists. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
