What kinds of failures have you been seeing? Any thoughts on making
relaxed better?
Tony
Michael Thomas wrote:
> John Levine wrote:
>
>> down the line, be sure it's perfectly 2822 conformant and use a relaxed
>> signature.
>>
>
> So we've been running relaxed body canonicalization on one of our
> production servers, and I can't say that I've seen any evidence that
> it is any better than simple.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
