Ned Freed wrote: > But if it is done by the MUA, the problem is that fully comformant SUBMIT > agents or various sorts of other conforming intermediaries can and often will > wreck the signature. And this says nothing about non-conforming > intermediaries, > which aren't exactly unheard of. > > If you want another example, how about RFC 4141? You're a coauthor of that > one. > >
Even fully compliant 2822 messages going in can have content tagged going out. Eliot _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
