>I also think that the putative "eat all CR/LF" c14n might be >hard to get approved, given the obvious vulnerabilities it'd >create.
It's come up before, and did not get any traction. In the spirit of rough consensus and running code, it seems to me that people who want a new c14n scheme should implement it and at least try it out on available message corpora and tell us what happened. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
