In short, it implies DKIM-BASE is based on a "Good Citizen" model
where
every "i is dotted" and every "t is crossed." But it lacks no
security
provisions for protecting against the most obvious of all DKIM
failures - in
this case as to relates the above statement - unauthorized signings.
What do you mean by an unauthorized signing, Hector?
Perhaps I don't understand something, but if some unauthorized entity
owns my DNS and my outgoing MTAs, then I have network problems beyond
the scope of DKIM.
Jon
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
