A recipient will then have a valid party to complain to which is better than blocking a domain that has been spoofed. Thanks,
Bill Oxley Messaging Engineer Cox Communications, Inc. Alpharetta GA 404-847-6397 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: John Levine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 12:17 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Oxley, Bill (CCI-Atlanta) Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options >As an example, an ISP that has 10k business customers who potentially >will want signed mail a Commercial.isp.com signing domain would >assert I only sign 3rd party It may well be true that you only sign third party mail, but I still don't understand what use a recipient might make of that information. If they get unwanted mail from someone and you've signed it, they'll complain to you regardless. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
