On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 08:01:18AM -0700, Michael Thomas allegedly wrote: > Hector Santos wrote: > > >One initial and obvious design consideration is length limit related. One > >reviewer did suggest some 'include' concept or protocol to access large > >list. > > > > > I'd venture to say that "include" ala SPF is specific NON-REQUIREMENT, > as it violates the requirement that the query operation provide a > deterministic > number of queries for discovery/fetching.
+1 I see very marginal benefit to that sort of indirection and a very large cost in operational complexity and test cases. Besides which, inheriting topology might be a common convenience that justifies complexity in an IP based model, but inheriting policy seems a much less likely and thus less compelling reason in a domain based model. Mark. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
