Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Folks, > > We all (or almost all) seem to be assuming that the DNS is the > place to put SSP stuff. > > I just wanted to raise the question to see if that's a requirement > or just a near-accidental part of the current design proposals.
Let me suggest that it will become a requirement, but that considering it one, now, is a mistake. In other words, use of DNS, or whatever, derives from functional and operational needs, rather than being a core need, on its own. In other words, we should be discussing 'requirements' in terms of semantic functions or practices/reputation/etc services that are need, rather than the details of the mechanisms that will be used to provide those services. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
