Jim Fenton wrote: >>> How does that differ from a sender that doesn't have the >>> "I sign some mail" flag set? >> Yes, exactly. > Might the SSP record that says "I sign some mail", which could have a > long TTL, be more effectively cached by DNS than the (negative) caching > when there's no record?
how does a "i sign some mail" help? If a message is signed, it either validates or it doesn't. If a message is not signed, then how does a "some mail" ssp flag help? d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
