I think the #1 requirement should begin as: - SSP requirements must|should support DKIM-BASE semantics.
or rephrased: - SSP requirements should|most not alter DKIM-BASE semantics. I think this is important because we might find out very quickly that there are some loose ends in DKIM-BASE. This is especially true in the area of multiple signatures. -- Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc. http://www.santronics.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
