From: "Stephen Farrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Hector Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Now that sounds *very* complicated, or else, very marginal > (in terms of places it could be used). A bank? Maybe with the growing "e-Medical" market, a doctor? or in general any high-value domain who will most likely have a Donald Trump "HUGE" expectation for direct 1 to 1 like exclusivity with no middle ware tampering. I am not sure if you (speaking in general of course <g>) is questioning the value of this or whether its possible to work or simply no one will want to use it. > There is harm there - we'd at least be creating a new > DoS opportunity where none would exist otherwise, and > that I definitely dislike. How would this Exclusive (I am the only one to sign) SSP policy DoS work and if so, why would not there be a defense? Or more general, where is the DoS where it would not be otherwise today? I just don't see how we are not defensive minded on DoS across the board, but for this one, we are? -- Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc. http://www.santronics.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
