----- Original Message ----- From: "Arvel Hathcock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 3:23 PM Subject: RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom
> So, focus narrowly on what receivers would find of immediate benefit > for an initial round of SSP work which will entice senders to provide it. > I hadn't looked at it quite that way before. This approach does have > several advantages -- not the least of which is the potential to > actually complete something useful in our life-times. Man, you made me laugh spit on my screen!! <g> I just want to know what receiver hat I am today? A - Developer of SMTP software or related APIs? B - Administrator of installed SMTP software or related API? C - Hosted Domains using results created A and B? D - End Users using results created A and B? I wish to remind you of what you said nearly 1 year ago, that really strikes at the core: > Before responding, I want to clear up something that's been bugging > me a little lately. I've seen the unfortunate habit of speaking > about something called "SSP" as if it were foreign to or a mere > enhancement of DKIM. In my view, SSP is DKIM. It is the heart > and soul of the proposal. [1] Ahem brother!! -- Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc. http://www.santronics.com [1] http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2005q3/000239.html _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
