One would assume that an additional signing algorithm has been introduced and not using the TOM SWIFTY algorithm I would refer to base and treat your message as unsigned. thanks,
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of John L Sent: Fri 8/4/2006 2:05 PM To: DKIM List Subject: [ietf-dkim] SSP thought experiment a) "SIGN ALL MAIL" and "DO NOT USE ANY SERVICES KNOWN TO DAMAGE THEIR SIGNATURES" b) "SIGN ALL MAIL" I want to put "ALL MAIL HAS TOM SWIFTIES" in my SSP. Assuming you agree that's ridiculous, what's the practical difference to people using SSP between that and b) above? Regards, John Levine, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://johnlevine.com, Mayor "I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
