>> What I have yet to hear is any sort of consituency for a monolithic >> "i sign everything" beyond the [EMAIL PROTECTED] scenario. For reference, we probably DO need to do some consensus assessments. I think that there have been some clear preferences by the working group, but I think they have not been formally stated, assessed and accepted by the working group. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom wayne
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP ax... Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SS... Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SS... Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundament... Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more funda... william(at)elan.net
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more funda... Hector Santos
