On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:48:05 -0400 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >An invalid signature is not unsigned, but we are not discussing that >policy point yet :-)
OK. If you have a useful distinction that can be made without creating a trivially exploitable trivial hole, I think that now, when requirements are being discussed, is the right time to do it. Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
