----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Delany" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2006 8:38 AM Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy
> DKIM+SSP is defining "damaged". +1 SSP does not attempt to evaluate the reputation of the sender or client. A good intention client can use SSP as well as the bad intention client. The main objective of SSP is to establish a protocol consistency and to use the deviation from the consistency as part of a failure detection system. -- Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc. http://www.santronics.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
