On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 10:53:21PM -0700, Michael Thomas allegedly wrote: > Hector Santos wrote: > > > > >Even then, the main issue are the potential damages that are being > >ignored. > >My wife said it best when asked why even the BIG companies like WALMART, > >YAHOO, CISCO, AOL.COM, BIGBANK should also support strong policies: > > > > > I can say with little hesitation that Cisco will never publish the "strong" > policy as envisioned by Mark for our user population. I'd be interested > to hear from Mark whether Yahoo-inc ever would for their corporate > users.
The question is whether there is a useful subset of domains that want a "strong" policy. All indications on this list are that a good number of us think "yes", so the "strong" policy position needs comprehensive coverage in your requirements I-D. Have you got that covered in your draft or would additional text be of use to you? Mark. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
