----- Original Message ----- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" To: "Scott Kitterman"
> The way to do this (if it should be done) would be to use > the SMTP extension mechanism. > > For example. Define a command option SDATA, Reciever advertises > it in response to EHLO, sender uses it to present signed data > in place of DATA. > > Might be a better implementation but the point is we should use > the SMTP extension mechanism not invent our own. I think that is what Scott had in mind. On a related note, early this year, I had written an I-D that address future PAYLOAD based technology considerations in this area, but never published it: SMTP Service Extension for Command HEAD http://isdg.net/public/ietf/drafts/draft-santos-smtphead-00.txt http://isdg.net/public/ietf/drafts/draft-santos-smtphead-00.html -- Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc. http://www.santronics.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
