On Wednesday 09 August 2006 16:53, Michael Thomas wrote: > Scott --- > > Scott -- I think it's both explicit and specific in other requirements > that the protocol > must publish that data, and some of those are MUST strength. I really > don't see why > we need to restate that here. > > That and I don't think there is any explicit or implicit proscription > here on when the > protocol ought not be invoked. The restriction on was forcing new > behavior for a > DKIM verifier, not on how the protocol could be used. > OK. You've spent a lot more time with the document than I have. I'll accept that.
I'll keep an eye on it when we get to design. Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
