Hector Santos wrote: > Protocol MUST allow for a informational text note for the > policy.
I always hated the exp= explanations in SPF. A "disclaimer" n=convoluted_legalese isn't better, IMO receivers won't care about it. You'd also get I18N issues with such "disclaimers". Frank _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
