On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:39:36 -0700 Jim Fenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >... In addition to other objections I have, if it is not >significantly simpler I question the need for an additional mechanism, >especially in a security context such as this.
I think the real question is simpler for who. I think it makes sense for operators to take on complexity is it simplifies thing for authors. ... >I have a list of other concerns, which I'll post separately. I started >with the security concern because it seemed the most clear-cut objection. I look forward to it. I don't want to do it if it's dumb. Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
