>I think that the NS suggestion is a bad one for policy reasons. I am >never going to delegate any part of my DNS. Space to a third party >and I don't think anyone else is likely to either.
Mailers routinely delegate subdomains to their ESPs right now. For example: $ dig email.orbitz.com ns ; <<>> DiG 9.3.1 <<>> email.orbitz.com ns ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 49736 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;email.orbitz.com. IN NS ;; ANSWER SECTION: email.orbitz.com. 16536 IN NS bb1dns1.edc.dartmail.net. email.orbitz.com. 16536 IN NS bb1dns2.ddc.dartmail.net. email.orbitz.com. 16536 IN NS bb1dns3.ddc.dartmail.net. email.orbitz.com. 16536 IN NS bb1dns1.ddc.dartmail.net. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
