----- Original Message ----- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The requirement that I believe that the delegation discussion > highlights is the need for controlled delegation. > I.E I delegate to Fred the ability to sign on behalf of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] but not [EMAIL PROTECTED] > The delegation example is relevant because it is only the > policy mechanism that creates the need to count a signature by > Fred as a domain signature for example.com. Ok, but you think it will still work or its consistent with the discovery requirement #1 discussed in section 5.1.1? Or is this a DNS record preparation issue? | 5.1. Discovery Requirements | | 5.1.1 [_] MUST use DNS RR TXT for Policy record. -- Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc. http://www.santronics.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
