> From: Douglas Otis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 08:46 -0700, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote: > > > > I don't see why any authentication policy would require > more than four > > terms, six at the absolute maximum. It is not necessary to > implement > > braces, merely specify whether AND or OR has higher precedence. > > While I agree that this is solvable using rather simple > syntax, it is yet to be determined whether even determining > precedence is needed. > This might be accomplished by their listed order.
I don't like depending on list ordering and it does not allow for as much flexibility. It is possible to convert any boolean expression in the form a.b.c + d.e + ... Or a+b+c . d+e . ... _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
