The main value I see in user level policy is easing phased deployment. If you are a bank with 100,000 employees with email and you want to deploy DKIM you probably want some form of hook that lets you do it in stages.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Thomas > Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 1:15 PM > To: IETF-DKIM > Subject: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp > > > All of this talk about additional requirements for user level > ssp ignores the basic question: should there be any > requirements for user level SSP at all? If so, what are the > use cases? I'm not terribly convinced that even that has > consensus -- this is the first that I even recall the subject > being raised. > > Mike > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html > > _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
