On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 11:26 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 13:31:56 -0700 Steve Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The impression I'm getting, from several people, is that "I always > > sign" is already being written off as likely to be ignored by > > recipients and that there needs to be a "No, I really mean it!" > > modifier? > > Or, to put it slightly differently... > > It's all signed when it leaves my MTA(s), but: > > 1. I know stuff will get broken along the way or come from other > MTAs, so please be gentle. > > 2. I don't care about the breakage and I'd prefer you reject unsigned > mail.
Agreed. "This domain uses non-complaint services." This policy could be surgically applied when it is possible to have separate policies for specific email-addresses (those used for transactional messages). This would allow for different annotations AND different treatments based upon a few critical email-address. -Doug _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
