On Monday 11 September 2006 22:38, Steve Atkins wrote: > On Sep 11, 2006, at 7:07 PM, Hector Santos wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Douglas Otis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >>> - Inconsistent results. > >> > >> Either the signature is valid or it is not. This does not depend > >> upon policy > >> ... > >> Can you be a bit more specific about what do you mean by > >> inconsistent results? > > > > I was referrering to the "Dark Secret" model that Mr. Falk and Mr. > > Akins was > > thinking about such as: > > > > Result = DKIM-BASE + REPUTATION > > > > This has the potential to be different depending on which receiver > > and its > > non-standard reputation layer. > > You seem to be deeply confused as to what "reputation" is. Every > receiving MTA, and possibly every recipient will have a different > view of a signers reputation. > > Given that, expecting everyone to have exactly the same result > when they apply their reputation model to an email that's authenticated > from a given author is obviously nonsensical. > OK, then I'm confused because I think that you and Hector are saying essentially the same thing in your message and his that you replied to.
Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
