On Sep 21, 2006, at 7:17 AM, Arvel Hathcock wrote:
In req-01 the definition for "DKIM signer complete" is:
"the state where the domain holder believes that all legitimate
mail purportedly from the domain was sent with a valid DKIM
signature."
Shouldn't this be:
"the state where the domain holder believes that all legitimate
mail purportedly from the domain was sent with a valid First Party
DKIM signature."?
When policy allows for an association to be made to other domains,
then this definition would be constraining that choice.
Allow policy to define what is a valid signature for a particular
email-address field or parameter.
-Doug
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
