Arvel Hathcock wrote: > For example, p=! would be better represented as p=strict. > Is this ok?
The text is fine, but wasting bytes while talking about DNS strikes me as bad idea. After a few more iterations in this direction we'd get XML-over-DNS CallerID again... <shudder /> Frank _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
