On Thursday 12 October 2006 14:51, DKIM Chair wrote: > We briefly discussed issue 1360, "delegation" vs "designation". We > appear to have support for this from only two WG participants, and > there are drawbacks in terms of complexity of the protocol. The > chairs' judgement is that we REJECT this issue. We'll allow some > further discussion on the mailing list, if the proponents want to > continue it (please put the issue number in the subject line). Lacking > further discussion, or increased support that would show rough > consensus for adding "designation", we'll ask Eliot to close the issue > as REJECT on 20 Oct.
I think it would be better to leave it in, but the use cases I was particularly concerned about have been addressed, so I no longer think it's essential. Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
