Eliot Lear wrote: > If you want issues opened, please include "new issue" in the subject,
I used "ISSUE:" as subject tag triggering #1398, therefore I sticked to what worked in <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.dkim/6566>. > Please include at least something more descriptive than the above so > people understand what precisely the issue is. The issue is Alice with an "I sign everything" SSP. Bob resends her mail, he has no clue what SSP and DKIM are, his MUA also doesn't know it, and maybe his ISP removed Alice's signature at the MDA (proposed by Doug as naive anti-replay strategy some months ago). Would the next hop check Alice's SSP (ignoring Bob's Resend-* header fields) and reject Bob's mail, if Alice's signature didn't survive the resending ? Or if her signature is too old. A related question is "what is a 'sender' in paragraph 4 of 4.1 ?", if you think it should get its own ticket it's okay. Frank _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
