>That is fair comment, but there seem to be an awful lot of people still >discussing the Role of Sender (and even List-ID and Return-Path) as >possible signing domains. > >OK, this is a petition for reopening this Issue.
-1 It's a feature that the signing domain isn't tied to other headers, not a bug. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
