Scott Kitterman wrote: > So how do we start down this path without ending up with PRA?
Well, I've often posted that while I hate PRA anything else (in 2822-land) is far worse, because it's incorrect... ;-) > 2822.From is the only identity that is reliably displayed to > the end user. In that point I agree with Hector: The problems of braindead MUAs are out of scope. A MUA ready for 4406 would display the PRA, it's a SHOULD in 4406. An OE for Vista probably <shrug /> Other MUAs can probably display the Return-Path if desired, as they should wrt 3834, 4408, and SMTP in general. But that's irrelevant for DKIM, DKIM is designed to be SMTP-agnostic (like PRA). > Follow this trail to the end and you end up protecting > resent-sender again. Yes. The alternative is to deprecate Resend-*, and I'd support to deprecate it. It breaks any serious attempt to make sense out of the 2822-header fields for PRA or SSP or 4409 8.1 again and again. Frank _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
