On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:04:00 -0000 "Charles Lindsey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>But users might not share you opinion of that. If the user's MUA has no >part to play in the matter, then the only options for his upstream is >"drop" or "not drop". Some users might be happy to devolve that >responsiblity to their upstreams. I would not, unless I had considered >their policy and agreed to go along with it (as I do actually; I have set >a Spamassassin score of 4+ which my provider devnulls for me; below that, >I inspect the mail myself). I didn't say 'drop', I said 'reject'. Dropping mail impacts the reliability of e-mail as there is no knowing if a message was delivered or not. Rejecting at the border MTA leaves responsibility with the sending MTA. Legitmate MTAs will let the originator know. Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
