You're missing this statement:
"In more formal terms, the "simple" body canonicalization algorithm
converts "0*CRLF" at the end of the body to a single "CRLF"."
This states *how*
Tony Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charles Lindsey wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:20:20 -0000, Tony Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to see either one of these two statements added to the end of
>> section 3.4.3:
>>
>> a) As a limiting case, an empty message body would be canonicalized
>> into a single CRLF pair.
>>
>> b) An empty message body should be canonicalized into an empty
>> string.
>>
> But isn't even the simple canonicalization then supposed to discard
> blank lines at the end of the message, thus rendering those two the same?
>
> Or what am I missing?
>
> --Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own
> thing------------------------
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
